According to qualitative reasoning in arguments, what is a common attribute amongst reasoning, claims, and predictions?

The correct answer highlights that reasoning, claims, and predictions inherently involve elements of conjecture and assumption. In qualitative reasoning, arguments are often constructed not solely on what is known or factual but include inferences and expectations about what is likely to be true based on the available data. This nature of qualitative reasoning allows for the exploration of hypothetical scenarios and interpretations that go beyond rigid factual evidence.

Such reasoning is often built on previous experiences, observations, and estimates rather than objective facts alone, which means that it embraces uncertainty and projection about future outcomes. This characteristic allows for a deeper analysis and understanding of complex situations that may not be definitively supported by data.

In contrast, the other options inaccurately suggest that these elements are either strictly factual, unequivocal truths, or completely devoid of context. These assertions do not align with the principles of qualitative reasoning, which acknowledges the role of uncertainty, conjecture, and the subjective nature of claims and predictions in arguments.